Bike Industry's Oversupply Crisis: How a Profit-First Model Can Be the Solution

The bicycle industry is currently trapped in a vicious cycle of oversupply. Wholesale and retail channels are choked with unsold inventory, and months of discount wars have failed to stimulate consumer demand, instead eroding industry profits. The entire sector is facing a severe test of its financial stability.
How did this happen, and what is the way out? Let's dive into an in-depth analysis from industry expert Rick Vosper.
Key Takeaways
-
The bicycle industry is facing a severe crisis driven by a "vicious cycle" of oversupply and profit-destroying discounts, with massive inventory buildup at all levels.
-
The root cause, according to expert Rick Vosper, is a long-standing business model focused on gaining market share at any cost, rather than prioritizing profitability.
-
With the U.S. cycling population stagnant for the past 25 years, brands are trapped in a zero-sum game, fighting for a slice of a non-growing pie, leading to a "prisoner's dilemma" of discounting.
-
The proposed "Bike 4.0" model urges a fundamental shift: from "growth worship" to a "profit-first" approach, focusing on matching supply with actual demand for all products, including niche models like the electric dirt bike for adults.
-
This transition requires retailers to adapt by using freed-up space for higher-margin services and consumers to adjust to a new normal with fewer deep discounts.
The Root of the Crisis: A Flawed Focus on Market Share
Vosper points out that the problem's origin lies in the industry's long-held, flawed goal of prioritizing market share above all else. This mindset, especially among the "Big Four" major brands, has been the dominant business principle since the Bike 2.0 era (late 1990s to early 2000s).
Era |
Core Strategy |
Outcome |
---|---|---|
Bike 2.0 (Late 90s - Early 00s) |
Increase the number of dealers. |
Dealers added more brands, diluting each brand's share and creating a zero-sum game. |
Bike 3.0 (~2000 - 2020) |
Control retail floor space and open D2C stores. |
Gained share from smaller brands and IBDs, but not from each other; market share among the Big Four remained static. |
Bike 4.0 (Proposed) |
Match supply to demand; focus on profitability. |
Aims to increase profits for the entire distribution channel by ending oversupply and constant discounting. |
However, pursuing sales growth in a saturated market is a paradox. The U.S. cycling population has not grown in the last 25 years. As Vosper bluntly states, "The bike boom is 50 years gone, and it’s not coming back any time soon."
The Prisoner's Dilemma of Discounting
To capture share, brands resort to price cuts, falling into a classic "prisoner's dilemma." "One way to steal sales from your competitors is to discount," Vosper explains. While this sacrifices profit, the hope is to boost market share through increased volume. In the short term, the first to discount might benefit. But in the long run, "all vendors are selling at the same reduced prices," and the only result is that "more product is forced into a market that doesn’t want it, via a profit-destroying discount mechanism."
Worse, brands intentionally over-order and force unwanted products onto their dealers. As Vosper incisively notes, "The practice of oversupply is not just deliberate, it’s an essential part of the quadropoly’s business model."
The Inventory Crisis: A Symptom of Systemic Flaws

The direct result of oversupply is an inventory crisis affecting the entire supply chain—from complete bikes to parts, accessories, and rubber (PA&R). This "dead stock" often consists of mismatched sizes and colors that fail to meet consumer demand, affecting everything from entry-level commuters to high-end specialist models like the electric dirt bike for adults.
This crisis is exacerbated by broken trust between suppliers and brands due to practices like "non-cancelable orders" with "730-day lead times," where brands place duplicate orders with multiple suppliers and then cancel them, destabilizing the supply chain. External factors like currency fluctuations and tariff uncertainties only worsen the problem.
The Path Forward: From "Growth Worship" to a Profit-First Model
The era of Bike 4.0 should pursue a supply that matches demand, not blind expansion. "Breaking our addiction to oversupply requires a completely different business model, especially for the industry’s largest and most established players," Vosper argues.
"What companies need to be looking at now is their bottom lines, at improving the profitability of the limited product they can actually sell, and at improving profits for the entire distribution channel, not at the failed goals of perpetual growth and increased market share relative to their competitors."
This means brands must "only procure and ship what they actually need," reducing overproduction. In turn, dealers can leverage reduced inventory by "allocating some of that saved retail space to higher-margin categories, such as used bikes or expanded service offerings," or even closing unprofitable stores to cut costs.
Challenges on the Road to Recovery
This transition faces two major hurdles. First, it may take years for consumers to adapt to a "new normal" without constant deep discounts. Second, brands might monopolize popular models through their D2C channels, creating a two-tiered system where dealers are left with basic models while premium ones are sold direct. This could boost brand profits but worsen the plight of dealers.
As Rick Vosper says, "Every problem is an opportunity." The industry must face reality: the vicious cycle of oversupply is unsustainable. As Alex Haley famously said, "You can either deal with reality, or reality will deal with you."
FAQ
Why are bike companies knowingly overproducing if demand isn't growing?
According to the analysis, it's a core part of a business model focused on gaining market share. By intentionally creating an oversupply and pushing it to dealers, major brands aim to dominate retail space and squeeze out competitors, even if it means relying on heavy discounting, which hurts overall profitability.
What is the "prisoner's dilemma" in the bike industry?
It describes a situation where all brands feel forced to discount their products. If one brand discounts, it might steal sales. But when all brands discount to compete, no one gains significant market share, and the only result is that everyone's profit margins are destroyed.
How does this oversupply crisis affect niche markets like the electric dirt bike for adults?
The crisis affects all product categories. Niche markets like the electric dirt bike for adults can suffer when brands force dealers to take on large inventories of less popular, mass-market bikes, tying up capital and retail space that could have been used for specialized models. It also means even high-end products get caught in the cycle of discounting, devaluing the category over time.
What is "Bike 4.0" in simple terms?
"Bike 4.0" is a proposed new business model for the industry that shifts the primary goal from "growth and market share" to "profitability." It advocates for producing and supplying only what the market actually demands, thereby ending the cycle of overproduction and constant sales, which should lead to healthier profits for both brands and retailers. Read more on our blog for industry insights.